As the summer blockbuster season winds to a close, The Bourne Legacy revisits a familiar
franchise with a new angle – one of the first “midquels” I’ve ever seen – and a
common twist – “Put Jeremy Renner in it.”
Both end up being profitable decisions, as The Bourne Legacy is perhaps more enjoyable than its forerunners, “Bourne
again” anew.
Taking place sometime during the events of The Bourne Ultimatum, Legacy wisely sets most of the original
trilogy aside and allows filmgoers to focus not on unraveling a nebulous conspiracy
but on following one man – Aaron Cross (Renner) – and his attempts to stay one
step ahead of government officials (led by an extremely dedicated Edward
Norton) who want him dead. Along the way
he meets up with Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), a scientist coming to terms
with her own involvement in the supserspy program that birthed Cross – and Jason
Bourne.
After stepping into Mission
Impossible: Ghost Protocol and representing the common-ish man in The Avengers, Jeremy Renner is wasting
none of his post-Hurt Locker inertia
by stepping into yet another big-league franchise. The decision to focus entirely on Renner is a
daring one, since the Bourne name is synonymous with Matt Damon, but Damon’s
absence here is barely noticeable, in part because Renner’s performance as an
edgy superspy is extremely compelling.
His Aaron Cross is a man forced into a difficult situation, and Renner
is a master of switching between lethal force and a killer sense of humor; the
transition never feels out of character.
But more importantly, the film crafts an interesting
narrative around him that renders superfluous any appearance by Jason
Bourne. Director Tony Gilroy performs an
almost impossible feat by making this film virtually stand-alone, never relying
on what’s come before but instead guiding us through a new corner of a shared
universe. The film expands on the
science behind the secret project that “created” Jason Bourne and goes deeper
into the human cost of such a large-scale initiative, but it focuses more on
the attempts of the government to roll up the project and obscure its existence
– with Cross in the middle.
The highlight of the Bourne films has always been their
intense action sequences.
Quantitatively, The Bourne Legacy
contains fewer, opting for a slow burn rather than a relentless string of big
moments. When the film does explode, it
does so with a few very well-directed sequences. I won’t spoil any by describing in too great
of detail, but there’s a first-rate shoot-out and a breathtaking motorcycle chase
that are as well-crafted as anything else in the franchise.
While The Bourne
Legacy probably won’t be the greatest movie you’ll have seen all summer, it’s
an exceptionally compelling film with thrilling action sequences and a great star
who knows how to get the audience on his side.
Although I can’t say for certain without rewatching the original
trilogy, this may be my favorite of the Bourne films.
The Bourne Legacy
is rated PG-13 for “violence and action sequences.” That kind of says it all right there.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
The Bourne Legacy (2012)
Labels:
2010s,
Bourne series,
Edward Norton,
Jeremy Renner,
movie reviews,
Rachel Weisz,
Rated PG-13
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment