
Where I thought
The Living Daylights was a welcome return to form for James Bond if a little
unmemorable, I have much nicer things to say about Timothy Dalton’s second
outing as the British superspy.
Although
Licence to Kill isn’t a perfect Bond
film, it does make me wonder what a third Dalton entry might have looked like.
After his old pal Felix Leiter is attacked on his wedding
night, James Bond (Dalton) springs into revenge mode against the man
responsible, drug lord Franz Sanchez (Robert Davi).
Cut off from official British support and on
the run from his own friends as well as Sanchez’s, Bond teams up with Sanchez’s
pilot Pam Bouvier (Carey Lowell) to bring the kingpin’s empire down around him.
If
The Living Daylights
was a throwback to the Sean Connery era,
Licence
to Kill is definitely a precursor to the current Daniel Craig incarnation.
Dalton’s Bond is dead serious here, more so
than in his debut film.
In fact, Bond
only starts cracking one-liners at the very end.
It’s entirely consistent with the tone of the
film, which is really quite grim, though it does seem a little less like James
Bond and more like a generic action hero.
Either way, Dalton is an infinitely compelling lead; his determination
and moral outrage is very well played, and it’s great fun to watch him scheme
against Sanchez.
That level of intellectual sophistication is another very
welcome tonal shift in
Licence to Kill.
Where some Bond films have been content to
let Bond blunder into the plot (or, more frequently, have the plot assigned to
him), Dalton’s Bond takes charge almost immediately, shooting out when
necessary but also – and this is something I’d love to see Bond do more often –
setting up dominoes and tricking Sanchez into knocking them over.
It’s nearly impossible for me to reconcile
the fact that this film is directed by John Glen, who previously inflicted
Octopussy upon us.
It’s probably Glen’s best directorial outing;
he keeps the pace moving for the entire runtime with no real dead spots.
In a weird way, Davi fills the humor void left by Bond with
a litany of droll puns; for example, after feeding a man to a shark, he notes
wryly, “He disagreed with something that ate him” (a line from Fleming’s
Live and Let Die novel).
Elsewhere, he carves out a romantic rival’s
heart and calls it “my little valentine.”
Davi and/or the screenplay is obviously trying to set Sanchez up as
Bond’s true opposite number, though the comparison doesn’t quite work with such
a humorless Bond.
It does make Sanchez a
memorable villain, a nice change of pace from the world-domineering evildoers
who’ve preceded him in this franchise.
(Keep your eyes peeled for a very young Benicio del Toro as Sanchez’s
creepy crony Dario.)
Licence to Kill is
a very gritty Bond, and for me that’s really not a bad thing.
In fact, I’d go so far as to say that this
film is actually quite underrated in the Bond canon.
True, it’s not an honest-to-goodness Bond
film without the punchlines, but it melds enough of the Bond trappings –
including a much-enhanced role for Desmond Llewellyn’s gadget-happy Q – with
classic late-80s action flair to create an entertaining and enjoyable Bond
film.
Licence to Kill is
rated PG-13 for “for action violence and drug content.”
This is definitely the bloodiest Bond to date
(and maybe still is to this day):
men
are fed to sharks, exploded in compression chambers, ground up in a shredder,
shot, impaled, exploded, and lit on fire – all in unflinchingly graphic detail.
(I cringed twice, and I’m made of relatively
stern stuff.)
Drugs are mentioned, sold,
and processed on screen, though none are used.
As far as sexual content goes, this is
probably Bond’s least libidinous outing.
James Bond and The Cinema King will return in a review of
Goldeneye (1995) on June 7, 2014!