Welcome to Week Thirty-Five of “Monday at the Movies.” Having wrapped our look at the “Alien Quadrilogy,” we unintentionally
continue profiling the work of Sigourney Weaver this week with a franchise in which
I’d honestly forgotten she appeared. You
all know the song; now try to get it out of your head.
Ghostbusters (1984)
– First, Ivan Reitman’s comedy classic is not remembered for being a
particularly great or innovative movie.
The film frequently compromises its own internal logic, there is a
dearth of character development in nearly every face on the screen, and at
times the film feels like a huckster trying to sell you a bridge. What saves the film, though, redeems all
those faults and makes Ghostbusters a
hit – the infectious camaraderie and earnest enthusiasm of its protagonists. It must have been a thrill seeing Bill
Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, and Ernie Hudson standing side-by-side on
the silver screen; added bonuses include Rick Moranis and Sigourney Weaver as
unwitting pawns in a supernatural scheme.
The undisputed star is, of course, Murray, whose semi-improvisational style
points out the film’s oddities with droll self-confidence (“We came, we saw, we
kicked its ass!”), contrasting nicely with Aykroyd and Ramis’s gee-whiz
enthusiasm for the premise. Unfortunately,
the script isn’t as tight as Ramis’s would be in the brilliant Groundhog Day a decade later; we don’t
quite get a handle on the villain’s big scheme, and the characters are
relatively flat. But Ramis, co-writing
with Aykroyd, does know the art of the non sequitur, as in the famous Stay-Puft
Marshmallow Man sequence, and it gives the actors and actresses plenty of room
to have fun. This, I think, is the film’s
greatest strength; it’s incredibly fun, which prevents the viewer from
nitpicking too closely. If cinema is
escapism, Ghostbusters is a top-notch
example of that tradition, warts and all.
Ghostbusters II
(1989) – In the sequel, the flaws are more apparent, in part because the
film opens itself too much to the negative effects on time. Operating after a real-time gap, Ghostbusters II finds the paranormal exterminators
out of a job and out of public favor; if it’s a commentary on box-office
demand, it’s a depressing way to begin the film. In fact, for a comedy, this is a pretty
depressing film. Murray, whose sardonic
wit carried most of the first film, seems genuinely bored here, and Aykroyd’s sincerity
seems like he’s trying too hard; Ramis doesn’t do much other than serve as a
punchline for other characters to imply how creepy he is. Weaver gets more to do here, presumably as a
consequence of her coronation as resident sci-fi queen; her battle to save her
son from a reincarnated Carpathian portrait is genuine and compelling, even if
the foe isn’t. The film also gives
Moranis a larger role, which is a credit to any movie; his desire to be a “real”
Ghostbuster is touching and clever all at once.
The soundtrack, though, is distractingly outdated, even more so than the
original film’s ultra-80s theme tune. I’m
feeling surprisingly down on this movie, which catches me off-guard because I
loved it so much as a child (I even had the coloring book, of all things). And it’s not to say that this is a bad movie;
it’s probably as intrinsically good as the original. But what happens in Ghostbusters II is that the cracks show more clearly so that a “just
good” movie never quite transcends beyond that level.
That does it for this week’s edition of “Monday at the Movies.”
We’ll see you here next week for an exciting new feature in the realm of The Cinema
King – stay tuned!
Monday, September 17, 2012
Monday at the Movies - September 17, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment