As British and Soviet submarines go missing, James Bond (Moore) is dispatched to find out how the subs are being tracked, while his opposite number in the KGB, Anya “XXX” Amasova (Barbara Bach), does the same. Amid tussles with the steel-toothed crony Jaws (Richard Kiel), 007 and XXX uncover the plot of madman Karl Stromberg (Curt Jurgens) to develop a master race dwelling in an underwater biosphere.
It sounds kind of hokey to type out like that – and indeed there is something implausible in the big scheme – but the execution works because it plays much closer to director Lewis Gilbert’s last Bond outing, You Only Live Twice (which saw Blofeld stealing rockets to hold the world hostage). And as the tenth Bond film in fifteen years, this one is populated with what feel like shout-outs to some of the series’ greatest hits: XXX references Tracy Bond, Stromberg’s lair recalls Dr. No’s aquarium dining room, and Jaws plays very successfully like an update of silent butler Oddjob. These little nods add up to a rewarding experience that winks endearingly at the audience, as all good Bond films ought to.
Another great thing about Spy is how well Moore comes into the role. I’ve given Moore positive marks in his first two outings as the top superspy, but those notes always came with the caveat that he was no Sean Connery. With Spy, Moore fully steps out of Connery’s shadow and comes up with a Bond that is quite original and wholly his. He’s light when he needs to be (including a great scene where he zings off one-liners as Amasova attempts to drive stick) and romantic enough to make his seductions plausible. Better, though, Moore deftly makes the shift to action hero, at home in hand-to-hand combat with the titanic Jaws and mastering the cold-blooded disdain that Bond ought to have when confronting megalomaniacs like Stromberg.
It’s only a shame that the other actors in the film don’t kill it like Moore does. In the unfortunate tradition of most “Bond girls,” Barbara Bach is badly miscast with an inconsistent Russian accent to match. It’s clear she was cast more for her décolletage than her delivery, to the film’s detriment; the plotline in which she comes to realize that Bond killed her lover (in a stellar pre-credits sequence involving ski jumps and the most British parachute ever) would have been much better served in the hands of a defter actress – or at least an actress who can emote beyond doe-eyed. (I wonder what someone like Julie Christie could have brought to the role.)
Additionally, I wasn’t sold by Curt Jurgens as the villain, since he overplays the grandiloquence of the character without leveling in much menace. His part in the film is small, restricted to his base of operations; in almost every scene Stromberg is seated at his dinner table, which subconsciously suggests that he might have been phoning it in a bit. Jurgens is far from the franchise’s best villain, though the creative team manages to make his nutty scheme bearable if not plausible. (Sidebar: Apparently James Mason was considered for the role – what a loss for moviegoers everywhere that he wasn’t hired!) Wisely, it seems, the film relies more on Jaws, an unstoppable physical force, a silent giant with a great visual hook.
With a lackluster villain and an uninspiring Bond girl – arguably two-thirds of the Bond formula – it’s even more surprising that the film works as well as it does. Perhaps Moore gets a bad rap, since it’s predominantly his shoulders upon which the film rests and succeeds. He’s a fine Bond here, and the decision to set much of the film in the Middle East gives a unique and intriguing atmosphere that makes the film eminently watchable.
The Spy Who Loved Me is rated PG. The “nudity” in the opening credits is a little clearer than it usually is, and in addition to Bond seducing two women we see one naked from the side through hazy shower glass. There are explosions galore, a few fist/gunfights, and one of Bond’s coldest kills ever (though no blood is seen).
James Bond and The Cinema King will return in a review of Moonraker (1979) on November 7, 2013! And I’ll be back on Thursday for a review of Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity – stay tuned!
No comments:
Post a Comment