Welcome to another installment of “Monday at the Movies.” There’s
a new King Arthur film at the box office this week... this is not a review of
that movie.
Excalibur (1981)
– Amid the dismal reviews for Guy Ritchie’s
King
Arthur: Legend of the Sword, I went back to the well for an ostensibly
definitive film of the Arthur legend which I’d managed to miss, even amid an
Arthurian phase in my adolescence. Although there are moments that, oddly
enough, recall a straight-faced
Monty
Python and the Holy Grail, John Boorman’s
Excalibur is otherwise iconic and epic, sweeping in a way that
sometimes makes the film seem episodic because of its steadfast refusal to
identify a singular protagonist. Is it Merlin (Nicol Williamson, delightfully
quirky as the aging wizard), the magician who shepherds England to prominence
even as his time is passing? Is it Arthur (Nigel Terry), the squire who has
greatness thrust upon him? Or is it the sword, whose absences and presences
account for the failures and triumphs of Camelot? Boorman isn’t choosy, which
allows the legend to spread out and take on a proper epic fantasy form. In just
over two hours,
Excalibur squeezes in
the sword in the stone, the assembly of the Round Table, the grail quest,
Lancelot’s affair with Guinevere, and the final battle with Mordred – a
far-reaching and ambitious effort that aims to do more in one movie than most
trilogies accomplish. Keep your eyes open, since
Excalibur stars a number of soon-to-be major stars in supporting
roles: Helen Mirren turns up as the sultry Morgana, the mother of Arthur’s
adversary Mordred, while Patrick Stewart, Liam Neeson, and Ciarán Hinds pop in
as knights of the round table.
Excalibur
has a visual style that sets a standard for mystical medieval fare and an
admirable amount of ambition befitting its subject matter.
That does it for this week’s edition of “Monday at the Movies.” We’ll see you next week!
No comments:
Post a Comment