
I’ve had a roller coaster of prerelease emotions when it
comes to
Blade Runner 2049, from
skeptical that we needed to revisit the 1982 classic to nervous that Ridley
Scott might direct (after he’d done the
Alien franchise a disservice with
Prometheus);
from cautiously optimistic that Harrison Ford was involved to exuberant upon
hearing that Denis Villeneuve would ultimately helm the film. Now that I’ve
actually seen it, I can attest that
Blade
Runner 2049 is the success it needed to be, another strong science fiction
outing from the man who brought us
Arrival
and a potent reengagement with the central questions that the original
Blade Runner continues to pose.
Ryan Gosling stars as K, a blade runner thirty years after
the events of the original film. On a routine “retirement” of one of a new
breed of replicants, K discovers a mystery that sets him on a new case, one
that will lead him to seek out Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford).
That’s about all I’d like to say about the plot of
Blade Runner 2049 – indeed, I almost
wish that the marketing hadn’t revealed that Harrison Ford was returning,
because the film unfolds at such a deliberate and methodical pace that each of
its reveals feels carefully measured and deployed at just the right moment. At
two hours, forty minutes, and then some,
2049
is long – not slow but disciplined, walking through the world of
Blade Runner without failing to stop and
take notice of the sprawling landscapes, the colossal neon billboards, and the
depth of the imagined future world. There’s so much content in the film that I
would have appreciated being surprised by Ford’s inclusion, but then again, I recognize
that Deckard is something of an elephant in the
Blade Runner room, and so his presence does feel like a
legitimizing agent to plant
2049
solidly in place.
I had the opportunity to rewatch the original
Blade Runner the night before seeing
2049, and it’s an arrangement I’d highly
recommend for an optimal viewing experience. (Back to back might numb the bum,
to say nothing of the back!)
Blade Runner
2049 does rely on parts of its predecessor, picking up plot elements and
referencing iconic visuals, but by the same token I do think the film works
well enough as a standalone that develops in a new but consistent direction, in
that sense reminding me a great deal of
Tron Legacy. Indeed, there’s been a trend lately of dusting off these classics
from decades past – Harrison Ford himself had already done it in
The Force Awakens – and seeing what they
have to say these years later. By and large, these efforts have to my eyes been
roundly successful, resisting the impulse to reboot (and the creative liberties
that might come therein) but rather working within the confines of the
established universe and layering in new roads, not unlike the way
The Godfather Part II filled in the
world of the first
Godfather and
extended its lifespan in gripping ways.
You have, of course, the continuing saga of Rick Deckard,
who’s as striking when he’s absent as when he’s present; where has he gone, but
more importantly why’s he gone away? (Here Ford is both the returning Han Solo
and the vanished Luke Skywalker.) But aside from extending the narrative of
Blade Runner (melding nicely with
whichever of the umpteen cuts you prize),
2049
looks for new opportunities; Jared Leto plays the erstwhile heir to the Tyrell
replicant empire, while Dave Bautista plays a surprisingly graceful farmer, a
far cry from either
Drax or
Mr. Hinx. Gosling is solid as always, a
well-deserved heir to Harrison Ford’s remarkably deft career, but I was
surprised that it’s Ana de Armas who steals more than her fair share of the
film, playing K’s holographic companion Joi (think a slinky, autonomous Alexa).
Joi allows the film to continue to probe the question of the lines between
simulation and reality in ways related to, but also quite distinct from, the
mystery posed by Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) in the original.
Simply put,
Blade
Runner 2049 is one of the better sequels in recent memory. Early in
production, Christopher Nolan had been bounced around as a possible director,
but – while I’ll never say no to more Nolan (particularly since his frequent collaborator,
Hans Zimmer, appears to have discovered the vuvuzela with his follow-up to Vangelis)
– I do think Villenueve is the ideal candidate here. As we saw with
Arrival, Villeneuve has mastered the
balance between wonder and revelation, in portraying immense scope with the weight
of narrative to match. (Has anyone called him yet for a
Star Wars film?) Villeneuve’s direction is capable and confident,
taking its time but earning that extended runtime by doling out information and
momentum to keep the audience right where he needs them to be.
I almost don’t want there to be a third
Blade Runner, but then I didn’t know I wanted the second one,
either. It’ll be exceedingly difficult to capture replicant lightning in a
bottle once more, and though there’s a thread here and there left unknotted the
film does seem to end in a place that feels whole and proper. If Villeneuve is in
the driver’s seat once more, though, I’m confident we’ll be in a good place.
Blade Runner 2049
is rated R for “violence, some sexuality, nudity and language.” Directed by
Denis Villenueve. Written by Hampton Fancher and Michael Green. Starring Ryan
Gosling, Harrison Ford, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright, and Jared
Leto.