Welcome to the first edition of “Armrest Reviews,” a new
series in which I, The Cinema King, will partner up with a fellow filmgoer to
review films as we watch them. That’s
right, we’ll be writing our unexpurgated observations as we watch the film, meaning
you could theoretically read the review while watching the movie and “watch
along” with us.
I’m joined by The Popcorn Prince, who’s been watching movies
for almost as long as I have. He’s a big
Batman fan, so I’m pleased to have him by my side for the debut of this
series. For today’s Armrest Review,
we’ll be watching Christopher Nolan’s 2005 Batman
Begins, the first installment in The Dark Knight Trilogy.
Cinema King: As the opening titles come on – no credits
here, no time to waste before the movie begins – a big welcome to The Popcorn
Prince. Prince, glad to have you.
Popcorn Prince: Thanks, King.
Truly an honor to help debut a new series. I’ve only seen this movie a few times, so
it’s good to go back right before the new movie comes out.
CK: I, on the other hand, have seen this movie dozens
of times since 2005, and it’s lost none of the thrill each time. Seeing those bats swoop in really sets a
tone.
PoP: I remember thinking, “Finally, no more
Schumacher camp. This Batman is going to
be scary as all get out.” He’s not that scary, but we get a Scarecrow who
still creeps me out.
CK: We’re getting ahead of ourselves here. The movie opens with young Bruce and Rachel
running through the Wayne Manor grounds.
PoP: I never noticed the soundtrack here, but
James Newton Howard and Hans Zimmer are really doing effective work to let you
know that something freaky is going to happen.
CK: And happen it does – Bruce falls into a hole
in the ground, gets attacked by bats, and wakes up in a Bhutanese prison.
PoP: Isn’t this Iron Man? He’s sharing a
cell with a wise-looking Asian man.
CK: But Bruce has one thing Robert Downey, Jr.
didn’t – Liam Neeson. And prison fights.
PoP: Bruce says this whole thing is just
practice. I haven’t read a lot of Batman
comics, but I always got the sense that he’s this totally driven detective who
is continually building himself up.
CK: Absolutely.
Grant Morrison recently called him “The Optimum Man” – actually, it was
Ra’s al Ghul who said it – and that’s something the movie really masterss.
PoP: You mentioned in your post yesterday – and
I’m not sure how many people caught it, because it was kind of tucked in there
– but you said that all of Christopher Nolan’s films are about obsession. I totally get it with Inception and Memento and
all the rest, but I don’t quite see how this film is about obsession.
CK: You don’t think that Bruce Wayne is
psychologically well-adjusted, do you?
PoP: Well, no, but he seems at least functional as
a human being.
CK: Yeah, and I think that we’ll have to take the
trilogy as a whole to determine the extent of his obsession, but it’s clear
that this Bruce Wayne is a man whose every waking moment is dominated by how he
can be the best vengeance machine.
PoP: Fair enough.
I guess I could see that, because it’s not like Ra’s just found Bruce in
a nightclub. He’s in this squalid hole
in the ground when Liam Neeson gets him.
CK: And Liam really sells this scene. He’s clearly got an enormous amount of
respect for Bruce’s mission and wants to help him, but his paternal
disappointment comes through later on when Bruce refuses to kill.
PoP: I love how we’re referring to him by his real
name and not his character’s name.
CK: Well, for one, I don’t want to spoil the
twist, but as a fan – especially of Taken
– I can’t help but look at him as this entity who exists in movies solely to
kick massive quantities of butt.
PoP: Whoa, Bruce Wayne was trained by Qui-Gon Jinn
and Brian Mills. Perfect.
CK: So here’s Ken Watanabe as Ra’s al Ghul, who’s
presented as some kind of monastery mystic with an enormous army at his
fingertips.
PoP: Despite the similar facial hair and the
enormous amount of exposition he gives – seriously, he kind of gives away the
whole arc of the film – Liam Neeson never once tips us off that he’s actually
Ra’s.
CK: Thanks for spoiling it. Suddenly we jump right back to Bruce’s fall
into the well, and his father asks, “Why do we fall, Bruce? So that we can learn to pick ourselves
up.” And with the third film called The Dark Knight Rises, you just know
that’s going to be important.
PoP: Nolan is really good at layering meaning over
echoed words and images. Like this
conversation about how Thomas Wayne wanted to cure the city of its economic
hard times – it’s so obvious that Bane is going to be an OWS-inflected villain,
and you almost wonder if the city would have thrived if Thomas and Martha
hadn’t been killed.
CK: In the comics there’s always that inference;
I think it’s been said several times that the murder of the Waynes affected the
city on a really deep level. Speaking of
which, Nolan tweaked the origin a little here, putting the Waynes at the opera and
entering the infamous back alley at Bruce’s insistence.
PoP: It’s his fear that led the family to their
death, making the film even more about Bruce conquering his own fears.
CK: Nolan’s immensely respectful of the source
material, even while reworking it a bit for his own purposes – the pearls and
Bruce’s posture are straight out of Year
One.
PoP: Putting a young Gordon on that night is a
great choice, especially because we get more Gary Oldman, who absolutely kills
as the man who would be Commissioner. Is
that from the comics, too?
CK: I don’t quite know, honestly. In Year
One, Gordon’s just getting to Gotham as Bruce is returning, but I remember
thinking this connection made perfect sense.
This is why Batman can trust Gordon – even in this quick exchange, we
can tell that Gordon’s one of the good guys.
He’s so gentle, so caring.
PoP: How has Oldman not won an Oscar yet? I’m sure I’ll have more to gush over later,
but this training montage is another example of how wonderful the soundtrack
is.
CK: Since Team
America, I’ve had a suspicion of montages, but having Liam Neeson talk over
it allays my doubts, and Bale’s reactions give more of a sense of continuity
than seeing his skills develop.
PoP: I’m glad we finally got an origin story on
film. I remember being upset that Tim
Burton’s Batman did that fake-out
with the rich couple being saved by Batman.
CK: I didn’t mind that, actually. Burton’s emphasis was more on what a freak
this guy was, while Nolan is trying to show how one person can change so much
based on the choices he makes.
PoP: Which Rachel will tell us later on.
CK: One more point for the script, and another
for seeing Bruce want to destroy Wayne Manor in a flashback, and by the end he
wants to rebuild it “brick by brick.?”
PoP: So here’s Katie Holmes, who is probably the
one weak link in this whole movie.
CK: But I think—
PoP: I can’t stand her.
CK: But I think Nolan does what he did with
Scarlett Johansson in The Prestige –
he really gets as good a performance out of her as possible.
PoP: I still think Maggie Gyllenhaal was a much
better choice.
CK: Well, yeah.
I also buy her as a lawyer much more than I do Katie Holmes.
PoP: Do you think the killer is sincere when he’s
apologizing for murdering the Waynes?
CK: It’s hard to say. I never figured he was, but Joe Chill is
never a tragic figure in the comics
PoP: I hope he was, because I like the idea that
Bruce has to fix the city rather than stop the crazies on a case-by-case basis.
CK: I like that; I could come around to
that. I really like how we see Bruce
consider guns, because I always felt that it’s a little too pat in the comics
where we have a teenager coming to this weighty “no guns” decision on his
own. Seeing him try and then reject
firearms makes more sense.
PoP: We see Bruce conquer that fear, and then he
faces Carmine Falcone to show that he’s not afraid. But really, who isn’t afraid of Tom
Wilkinson?
CK: He might be lovable in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, but he really sells the whole angry
mobster character, especially as Batman’s first real foe. He’s a representation of every “first step”
Batman has to take on – he’s disrespectful of Bruce’s past, he’s drunk on his
own corrupt power, and he’s a criminal.
PoP: Even without the villains later in the film, I
would have been happy if the whole movie had just been Bruce taking on Falcone.
CK: And Nolan could have pulled it off, too. But if Bruce is mastering his own fear, you
kind of need The Scarecrow, and having a clear mentor like Liam Neeson helps
make the transition to “Optimum Man” more credible.
PoP: Although I’m not big on this whole
hallucination scene where Bruce is tripping on blue flowers and fighting ninjas,
it kind of works because the film never acts as though this couldn’t actually
happen. There’s no wink at the audience;
the film plays itself totally straight, which is probably its greatest
strength.
CK: I remember being really upset seeing this the
first time, because I knew Ra’s al Ghul as this ultimate immortal badass who’d
lived for millennia building his empire, and then Nolan shaves his head and buries
him under an avalanche.
PoP: Yeah, the film never hints that this isn’t
over, and I even wonder if the rumor is true that Bane is leading the League of
Shadows to finish Ra’s al Ghul’s mission to destroy Gotham and stop it from
breeding criminals.
CK: It’d be a great way to round off the trilogy
by bringing it all back to center, but I like it better when Nolan keeps moving
forward and building upward the way he did with The Dark Knight.
PoP: Save it for tomorrow, King. You’re talking over the big battle scene of
the first act, which means I’m missing some awesome score.
CK: You’re really a fan of this music, aren’t
you? More so than I am?
PoP: Seems that way. It’s not Danny Elfman, but Zimmer and Howard nail it.
So now Bruce is ready to be Batman?
CK: Absolutely not. In Batman:
Earth One, which just came out, his grappling gun tangles the first time he
uses it, and he can’t leap rooftops like he wants to, and in this movie Bruce
makes a bunch of rookie mistakes that make him better. But he wants to be a symbol, which it seems
like he’s become by The Dark Knight Rises,
albeit not in the way he wants.
PoP: I get the feeling I’m here to keep you on
task. That’s tomorrow.
Stay tuned for Part Two of our Armrest Review, in just a few short hours!
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Armrest Review - Batman Begins, Part One
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment