Neeson stars as federal air marshal Bill Marks (a name you won’t forget because of the way it’s growled throughout) on a red-eye transatlantic flight. Midway over the ocean, Marks receives a series of texts from a terrorist who promises to kill a passenger every twenty minutes – and, we soon learn, frame Marks in the process. But we know it’s not all as easy as that, and Neeson does not disappoint in his resilience, very nearly hijacking the flight in an attempt to clear his name.
Let’s establish one thing straightaway – Non-Stop is not Taken. It’s a far cry from Pierre Morel’s masterful action film, which still manages to thrill after all these years. In fact, I might be more generous toward Non-Stop precisely because its star makes some of the script’s sins forgivable, or at least bearable. Neeson is as always a stalwart and reliable action star, gravelly and determined. He communicates both desperation and dedication in equal parts, allowing us to feel the urgency without fully doubting his abilities.
Bill Marks may share a set of initials with Taken’s Bryan Mills, but he lacks that critical “set of skills” with which the latter might have quickly resolved the crisis. Instead, the script saddles him with textbook substance abuse and past family trauma, but it’s to Neeson’s credit that he pulls off these rather generic gestures toward characterization and pulls in a convincing portrait of a troubled man pushed to his limits.
Where Non-Stop misses the bar set by Taken is largely everywhere else in its filmmaking. At 110 minutes, the film feels longer than it needed to be, in part because Bill Marks is air-marshaling aboard a flight chock overfull of narrative detours. One even suspects that Julianne Moore was cast because of her hair color as a literal personified red herring. The problem is that the film’s reliance on the classic locked-room formula means that Bill’s initial hunches are necessarily wrong; this puts the audience in the position of being fully aware of the misdirections at work, and the film never really tries to counteract our sense of those sleights of hand. Consequently, the film feels in a bit of a holding pattern while the intuitive audience members look for the real clues behind the foreground. Neeson’s performance is compelling, very much enough to hold your attention, but on reflection it’s very much a B-movie superstructure.
The film is, however, at its best when it surrenders to what might be considered the “dumb fun” action of the third reel, when the story takes on a ticking plot twist and a spiraling set of revelations. Non-Stop does suffer from exposition-heavy villain monologuing, but it counterbalances with flashy fistfights and even a bit of high-altitude/high-stakes gunplay. Ultimately, then, Non-Stop succeeds or fails based on how highly you value the screen presence of Liam Neeson. For this filmgoer, it’s a fun enough diversion though not a close contender for greatness.
Non-Stop is rated PG-13 “for intense sequences of action and violence, some language, sensuality and drug references.” There are a few deaths on the plane as the terrorist makes good on the every-twenty-minutes threat. A younger passenger is seen flirting with two older men, and IMDb reports two F-words (only one of which I recall).
While The Cinema King enjoys spring break, it’s the perfect opportunity for multiple reviews. So come back on Thursday for my take on Mr. Peabody & Sherman!
No comments:
Post a Comment